| Re-achieving Economic Prosperity |
|
|
|
|
|
odysseus04
New Member
Cash: $ 0.00
Posts: 4
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
|
| Re-achieving Economic Prosperity |
 |
|
Has anyone been paying attention to the 2004 Presidential Candidacy? It's never too early to start. In any case, I was watching Pres. Candidate Howard Dean speak about economic prosperity and I truly feel that our government could prosper greatly under him. He has quite a job ahead of him, if he is elected, what with Bush's soaring-defecit (uni-lateral war!? GREAT IDEA!!) Any thoughts?
~Joshua
|
Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:09 pm |
|
|
Don Quixote
Contributing Member
Cash: $ 0.00
Posts: 34
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
|
first the deficit...it is shrinking...new reports of vastly increased revenues due to customer spending, and great economic improvement shows that the deficit won't be a factor...and it or "they" never really are...
lemme tell you something about howard dean...or his govenorship...he took over the govenor's office from a dude that raised taxes more than any govenor in vermont histoy...so it "looks" like he cut taxes...when in all reality the huge taxes the previous govenor levied, gave dean boo-koo bucks to balance the budget...
I'm not even going to get into the security and military aspect of dean...it is TOO scary ! 
dean IS all about smoke and mirrors...
check for yourself...
|
|
Tue Dec 16, 2003 11:35 pm |
|
|
odysseus04
New Member
Cash: $ 0.00
Posts: 4
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
|
Yeah, he did usurp power, before he re-achieved it 5 times. And it's not tax-cuts that are driving his economic policy. And wihtout a demcrat in office, that deficit isn't going to shrink; it's the natural order of things.
Dean foreign security policies resemble that of Roosevelt. Anyone remember him? Yeah, he was a bad president......................
~Joshua
|
|
Wed Dec 17, 2003 1:16 pm |
|
|
Don Quixote
Contributing Member
Cash: $ 0.00
Posts: 34
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
|
quote:
And wihtout a demcrat in office, that deficit isn't going to shrink; it's the natural order of things.
two things...one the governments over spending has never been a concern...and the dems didn't know what "balanced budget" meant until the republican revolution and newt gingrich passed the balanced budget amendment...
ok three things...if it were not for the tax cut to stimulate the economy and the low interest rates...we would be in a "stagflation" situation...(double digit inflation and double digit interest rates) a term coined under the carter administration...
remember him ?
BTW, isn't dean just a little too angry of a man to have his thumb on the button ?
|
|
Wed Dec 17, 2003 4:00 pm |
|
|
|
