Home   Forum   401k   Credit Cards  
    Register   Login   Members   Search   FAQs     Recent Posts    
How much did you put down on your house?

Reply to topic
Money Talk > Real Estate

Author Thread
fultron
Preferred Member


Cash: $ 3.50

Posts: 103
Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Location: NJ
How much did you put down on your house?  Reply with quote  

If you own your own home, how much did you put down as a down payment, percentage-wise?
A few years ago we bought our first house and could only put down about 8%.

Saving Money
Post Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:11 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
coaster
Senior Advisor


Cash: $ 1358.20

Posts: 6687
Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
 Reply with quote  

About 30%. The plan was to take out a 15-year loan, and 30% down gave me a monthly payment that was "comfortable."

~Tim~

Eye Candy : Why Whimsy
Post Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:21 am
 View user's profile Send private message
Stoney
Member


Cash: $ 2.65

Posts: 23
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
downpayment  Reply with quote  

I put down 15% on a few years ago on my first purchase... That is a great topic of discussion though!
Post Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:42 am
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
No-Brainer
Senior Member


Cash: $ 66.65

Posts: 907
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Location: Oregon USA
It's been a while  Reply with quote  

Our first house we put down $500 and made $100 a month payments 34 years ago.

Our current house was $41,000 and we put down $5,000 from the profit received selling the first house 29 years ago.

We just refinanced to borrow $100,000 and it appraised for $290,000

US Click Ads
Pathway to Income
Post Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:48 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rolo
Yo' Daddy


Cash: $ 309.70

Posts: 1551
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Location: Colorado/Florida
 Reply with quote  

Both houses: zero.

Mortgage money is cheap; take advantage of it.

"Expect me when you see me."
Post Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:06 am
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jaszbo
Preferred Member


Cash: $ 35.90

Posts: 177
Joined: 03 Jan 2006

 Reply with quote  

I like coaster response and have to agree with him that doing the 15 year mortgage is what I prefer also.
Personally the 20% down is to avoid PMI, even though there's ways to avoid PMI you are still paying for it. Depending on your lender, some give you a better rate the more you put down. My lender for instance gives the best rate at 20% down, but my lender for instance is one of the only lenders I know that doesn't charge PMI if you put down at least 3%.

If you only put down 8% and you're paying PMI watch the value increase and if you've gone over that 20%, some require 25% if it's not a refiance to get rid of PMI.

If you put 8% down and you want 20%, I'm calculating about 3.5 years of holding if you assume only a low 3% apprecation per year. Some lenders do require you though to keep your house for a certain amount of time before getting rid of PMI and even some require a higher than 20% increase to get rid of it. If you can get a better rate out there and don't mind paying the closing cost, you can get rid of the PMI right away instead of waiting.
Post Thu Jan 19, 2006 2:32 pm
 View user's profile Send private message
Rolo
Yo' Daddy


Cash: $ 309.70

Posts: 1551
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Location: Colorado/Florida
 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by coaster
"comfortable."


A deceptive emotion.

I could not be comfortable knowing I threw away an 11% return (minimum, investing) in favour of a 5.75% (mortgage interest) return.


PMI is not always required if you do not pay 20% down. PMI is a fee and I never pay fees. I'd rather burn money than pay fees...that way, at least I get some entertainment out of the same result.

"Expect me when you see me."
Post Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:05 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
efflandt
Senior Member


Cash: $ 80.45

Posts: 401
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Location: Elgin, IL USA
 Reply with quote  

In 2002 I put 20% down on my first home for 30 yr fixed, and then refinanced in 2005 to 20 yr lower fixed rate to knock off 7 yrs of payments and $62k of interest. Since it was with the same lender, refinance closing costs were only $170.

If I have any money left after maxing out my 401k and Roth IRA, I have been direct purchasing/div. reinvesting stock in my bank. With any luck the return will more than double the savings of paying down the principal early. It currently pays ~4.5% dividend, which alone covers loan interest on that money (with all tax considerations). Although, I could do better with stock in a foreign bank (one I bought Oct. 4 in my IRA is up 34%).
Post Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:06 am
 View user's profile Send private message
bong12187
Preferred Member


Cash: $ 24.50

Posts: 120
Joined: 31 Jul 2005

 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by Rolo
quote:
Originally posted by coaster
"comfortable."


I could not be comfortable knowing I threw away an 11% return (minimum, investing) in favour of a 5.75% (mortgage interest) return.


PMI is not always required if you do not pay 20% down. PMI is a fee and I never pay fees. I'd rather burn money than pay fees...that way, at least I get some entertainment out of the same result.

When would it be ok to pay PMI? I've actually bought a property using 10% and I am currently paying PMI. The purchase price was 115k using 30 yr amort with 7.5% interest. Rolo is right that PMI is not always required however, if you do have to pay the PMI, please do the numbers to see if it is worth putting down higher down payment to forego PMI. Looking at the numbers I provided, putting a downpayment of 11.5k (10%) instead of 23k (20%) clearly show that the cash on cash return (PMI is $75 per month) is not as significant. BTW, rent is 1100 per month. Thanks...
B
Post Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:11 am
 View user's profile Send private message
Rolo
Yo' Daddy


Cash: $ 309.70

Posts: 1551
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Location: Colorado/Florida
 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by bong12187
Looking at the numbers I provided, putting a downpayment of 11.5k (10%) instead of 23k (20%) clearly show that the cash on cash return (PMI is $75 per month) is not as significant. BTW, rent is 1100 per month.


That's a good point.

..from an up-and-coming Donald Trumpster.

"Expect me when you see me."
Post Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:39 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mattb79
New Member


Cash: $ 0.65

Posts: 8
Joined: 21 Jan 2006

 Reply with quote  

With a downpayment for real estate, the more the better right? Can anyone describe a situation where it may be in your best interest (in terms of the loan) to not max out the down payment?

ask me about IPO investing opportunities! 703-929-7605 <read the thread>
Post Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:48 am
 View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bong12187
Preferred Member


Cash: $ 24.50

Posts: 120
Joined: 31 Jul 2005

 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by mattb79
With a downpayment for real estate, the more the better right? Can anyone describe a situation where it may be in your best interest (in terms of the loan) to not max out the down payment?

Again, it depends... If you are buying real estate for your own, I would probably recommend that you put as much downpayment as you can. However, for real estate that involves flips and passive income, less money that comes out of your pocket the better. Lets look at one example here. You have 20k for downpayment. If you buy a property with zero down, and you flip it for 120k within 2 months your cash on cash return is 20,000% (maybe less because you had to pay 2 months of mortgage pmt). If you put 20k down, and the same scenario applies, your cash on cash return is 400% (within two months of course). Such a big difference, huh?
For passive income, the criterion is the same with the exception of you having to know the rental market well so that if you get a zero down loan, your monthly rent must exceed the monthly mortgage + insurance + taxes + etc. etc....

Rolo... BOINK!!!! too funny....
Post Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:01 am
 View user's profile Send private message
Rolo
Yo' Daddy


Cash: $ 309.70

Posts: 1551
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Location: Colorado/Florida
 Reply with quote  

quote:
Originally posted by mattb79
Can anyone describe a situation where it may be in your best interest (in terms of the loan) to not max out the down payment?


I did. Mortgage money is cheap. Can you make a greater return on investments than you pay for a mortgage?

My whole IRAs made 37%, 34%, and 30% over the past year and my crappy index-fund only TSP made 18+% for the past one and three years; why would I pay down a 5.75% loan?

"Expect me when you see me."
Post Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:06 pm
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sam1000
Full Member


Cash: $ 21.05

Posts: 95
Joined: 28 Jul 2005

 Reply with quote  

Almost all first time buyers in SoCal put 0 down (usually combined with an interest only loan) because the prices are so atriociously high. Even 10% down on a $650,000 house is $65,000, most first time buyers don't have that kind of cash lying around for just a downpayment Shocked
Post Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:41 am
 View user's profile Send private message
Kirby
Contributing Member


Cash: $ 5.40

Posts: 26
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
 Reply with quote  

The old standard of 20% here when my family purchased a house recently.

www.kirbyonfinance.com: the best personal finance information on the web!
Post Wed Jan 25, 2006 5:49 am
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Goto page 1, 2  Next

Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
  Display posts from previous:      






Money Talk © 2003-2011



Arcade Banner Exchange