Social security tax on a roth? |
|
|
|
marathon don
Member
Cash: $ 2.60
Posts: 11
Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Location: Denver, Colorado |
Social security tax on a roth? |
|
|
I am getting ready to roll from a traditional IRA to a Roth and will have to pay 33% in Fed taxes.
It is my understanding that SS taxes are on wages and not on this rollover. I am correct? If they do pertain to this rollover are they included in the 33% tax or do I pay seperately and how?
Just trying to avoid any penalty for under payment of SS tax. I've never heard of one.
Thanks in advance,
MD
|
Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:41 am |
|
|
BlankenshipFP
Money Talk Advisor
Cash: $ 79.56
Posts: 390
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Location: Illinois |
coaster is absolutely correct about the OP's question. Not to pick nits, I just wanted to clarify something about the language: OP is going to perform a "conversion" from a trad IRA to a Roth IRA, not a "rollover". The two activities are vastly different in their tax treatment.
We now return you to your regular programming...
Jim Blankenship, CFP�, EA
Blankenship Financial Planning, Ltd.
www.BlankenshipFinancial.com
Standard IRS Circular 230 Notice Applies
|
Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:13 pm |
|
|
BlankenshipFP
Money Talk Advisor
Cash: $ 79.56
Posts: 390
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Location: Illinois |
It's your forum.
Jim Blankenship, CFP�, EA
Blankenship Financial Planning, Ltd.
www.BlankenshipFinancial.com
Standard IRS Circular 230 Notice Applies
|
Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:19 pm |
|
|
BlankenshipFP
Money Talk Advisor
Cash: $ 79.56
Posts: 390
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Location: Illinois |
I just meant that you seem to have a good grasp on everything going on in this forum, you nearly "own" it.
I haven't checked out the Bill Sebastian forum - who is Bill Sebastian (no slight intended)?
Jim Blankenship, CFP�, EA
Blankenship Financial Planning, Ltd.
www.BlankenshipFinancial.com
Standard IRS Circular 230 Notice Applies
|
Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:05 pm |
|
|
oldguy
Senior Member
Cash: $ 751.85
Posts: 3656
Joined: 21 May 2006
Location: arizona |
quote: I am getting ready to roll from a traditional IRA to a Roth and will have to pay 33% in Fed taxes.
Not part of your question - but why on earth would you convert a Trad IRA to a Roth while you are in a 33% tax bracket?? Plus your state income tax? Likely another 5% to 7%?
You don't have to pay tax on this until age 70 1/2, you can let the whole fund compound - then at age 70 1/2 you can sell a little each year probably for 15%.
|
Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:52 am |
|
|
oldguy
Senior Member
Cash: $ 751.85
Posts: 3656
Joined: 21 May 2006
Location: arizona |
quote: A lower tax rate but at a higher gain might net out to more later.
It would be a mistake to look at minimizing the taxes - look at maximizing what is left for you after taxes.
I would keep the IRA, leave that 40% invested inside the IRA, let it double or triple over the next decades, and then pay about 15% on it when I have to sell my RMDs (which I now have to do).
|
Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:36 pm |
|
|
marathon don
Member
Cash: $ 2.60
Posts: 11
Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Location: Denver, Colorado |
My email gave me no indication this thread was on going and I appreciate the replies.
Tim thanks for the reply you posted weeks ago.
To answer oldguy. I did the conversion based on current and projected economic and political events. I have what I hope to be several more working years ahead of me. I am of the mindset to pay taxes on the seed (after tax contributions) and not the harvest (tax free gains). Meaning I much rather pay tax on 5K in wages than taxes on a possible 100k gain. That’s the way I’m looking at it.
And btw, does anyone have a recommendation on a good country to move to for at least four years?
|
Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:09 am |
|
|
oldguy
Senior Member
Cash: $ 751.85
Posts: 3656
Joined: 21 May 2006
Location: arizona |
quote: Meaning I much rather pay tax on 5K in wages than taxes on a possible 100k gain. That’s the way I’m looking at it.
It doesn't work that way. You are giving up $2000 to taxes, and leaving only $3000 to grow to $60,000. If you left the whole $5000 to grow it would be $100,000 with $15,000 due in taxes, ie $85,000 net (better than $60,000 net).
|
Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:46 pm |
|
|
|